No. Identify the actual stage of the agreement and have the proposed arrangement assessed before relying on it.
Resolve the commercial decision honestly
A preferred closing date does not establish direction or immigration permission. Do not present an anticipated amendment as already effective.
The usual structure protects both requirements at once: a purchase agreement whose completion is conditional on visa issuance, with funds held under escrow instructions that release irrevocably to the seller on closing, so the capital is genuinely committed while your exposure is defined. Reconcile the operating agreement, capitalization table, escrow or purchase conditions, vendor deadlines, opening budget, and control rights. The order that works is to amend the terms, obtain the counter-signed amendment, release or restructure the escrow, collect the supplier's confirmation of what is now fixed, and only then assemble the evidence pack. Some qualifying arrangements involve an investment-in-process or escrow structure, so the proposed terms should be reviewed before deciding on the sequence rather than assuming every purchase must be fully closed first. Some structures may allow a proposed investment to be assessed while a sale is still completing, but the sequencing needs review rather than an assumption that one must fully close before the other can proceed.