TN
That U.S. opportunity is worth a conversation. Explore professional work through the TN pathway.
For the next job. The bold idea. The life you can already picture.
U.S. visa support for Canadians
ready for what’s next.
Hypothetical example: a Cambridge applicant has an offer letter, a detailed role description and financial records that use different names or dates. Before preparing a U.S. pathway account, identify which facts are current and explain the differences. A polished summary should not conceal an unresolved inconsistency.
The six pathways use different evidence. TN concerns listed professional work and credentials; L-1A and L-1B concern qualifying company transfers in managerial, executive or specialized-knowledge roles. E-2 requires a qualifying treaty investment and enterprise. EB-5 has capital, job and participation conditions, while Gold Card uses official gift terms with individual eligibility review.
Choose what brings you here. Leave with a short list of things to discuss—not another long form to fill out.
Different letters should be explained before selecting the profession.

Mark the specific difference needing explanation: employer identity, real duties, knowledge used, control of funds, transfer history or applicant names. Keep original records intact and explain corrections accurately. The aim is a truthful account supported by evidence, not identical wording imposed on documents created for different purposes.
Meet the people in your cornerPersonal support.
A practical plan.
No promises we can’t keep.
State which names, duties, dates or transactions appear inconsistent.
Keep the source records and distinguish a real correction from a rewritten history.
Assess how the clarified fact affects the actual classification or proposed activity.
Resolve required evidence and actual permission before relying on the plan.
Distinguish an actual error from a legitimate difference in scope. A payroll record and corporate chart may describe different things; a currency conversion and an investment payment are different events. Identify who can clarify the fact and what information remains unknown.
Find your pathwayPrepare the Cambridge consultation with the genuine records and a short explanation of the unresolved issue. No local applicant prevalence or special municipal immigration condition is assumed. The review can identify next evidence steps without replacing official decisions or promising a work, residence or financial outcome.
Let’s connectArrange a remote consultation to discuss your next steps.
Preserve genuine records and explain the difference. Do not recreate missing originals or hide an inconvenient fact.
No. Documents can serve different purposes; assess whether the underlying facts are accurate and consistent.
The actual control, risk and transaction conditions matter. A transfer by itself may not answer them.
No. Accurate evidence supports assessment, while all applicable requirements and official decisions remain relevant.
Editorial source review: 2026-09-07.
Tell us where you are today.
Let’s talk about where you want to go.