No. Identify its actual stage and how the business will obtain the necessary resources. A future plan and an existing operation are different evidence.
Use the proper new-office chronology
The first approval year and later extension evidence concern actual progress. A revised contract date does not restart the organization’s U.S. doing-business history.
After the ownership documents are in order, the qualifying year is evidenced and the US operation is genuinely ready for the transferee, and with enough margin before the intended start for a request for further evidence. Ask explicitly whether waiting a few months would improve the chronology, since continuing in the qualifying role abroad may complete a cleaner period of service while further United States business travel may complicate one. Filing makes sense once the qualifying year abroad has been earned, the American staffing supports a managerial role, and the corporate relationship is documented; filing before those three are true usually produces a request for evidence rather than an approval.